Leo - offer pending???

[Jono310]

Originally Posted by madwa

spending £5 to get £2.40 back, right... u should stop abusing the offers

haha a very astute observation!!

[PotNoodle]

Thanks for the reply, now I guess i'll wait for the official reply from my support ticket. Please lock this thread now.

[PotNoodle]

Originally Posted by Jono310

haha a very astute observation!!

Not really, he doesn't know what he's saying. I actually don't have to spend any of my money on the actual credit on the phone, as it's FREE and already on there.

[Lucaio]

Originally Posted by PotNoodle

Not really, he doesn't know what he's saying. I actually don't have to spend any of my money on the actual credit on the phone, as it's FREE and already on there.

In a way isn't that technically scamming though?

[PotNoodle]

Originally Posted by Lucaio

In a way isn't that technically scamming though?

How??? They are getting the exact amount needed, scamming would be using no credit or not enough credit.

[Lucaio]

Yeah but in a way you are cheating the system.

[PotNoodle]

No, i'm not. So you think that Leo, Funmobile, Jamster etc, are only done ONCE by EACH person on points.kudos? Didn't think so!

[rob7b]

Originally Posted by PotNoodle

No, i'm not. So you think that Leo, Funmobile, Jamster etc, are only done ONCE by EACH person on points.kudos? Didn't think so!

why are you doing them more than once anyway? Its frowned upon to cancel any offer and technically your canceling the offer 5 times. Its exactly this sort of behavior that gives the networks a bad image. There are plenty of decent offers but unfortunately most are not available to reward networks...and the main reason is because of the high levels of "bad traffic" associated.

If users did the offers in the spirt in which they are meant for (ie try before you buy) then we would not have so many companies withdrawing their products/advertising from our sites. Do you really think that MyPengo, jamster and whoever else want customers to sign up, use their free £5 credit on their sim card, just to get their free points/referral. They want you to try the service, if you like it then carry on with the subscription. The reason why there are so many offers available on the networks is so that users can choose the best offer that suits their needs, not to just buy 500 sim cards off ebay and scam networks and publishers.

Its frustrating to find a new publisher, only to read that they do not allow incentive/reward sites, and you wonder why they say this.

[FurbtasticM]

Gotta say, I'm confused. Is this against the official line on sites like Points? If so, why didn't Jon close the thread?

[PotNoodle]

Originally Posted by FurbtasticM

Gotta say, I'm confused. Is this against the official line on sites like Points? If so, why didn't Jon close the thread?

It's not against anything. I've requested ages ago for this thread to be closed, as i've received a reply for my support ticket.

[kudos]

Just to clarify my position here:

I ran into this problem very early on when I initially launched the points site.

My thoughts were the same as Jon's in that it should be strictly one offer per user. Simple.
However, I contacted the ringtone companies to be sure and had replies back confirming that it would be ok as long as everyone got paid.

The problem comes in when people are completing them without paying the credit. Doing the offer more than once is one thing, but doing it more than once without paying is just taking the p***!!

My stance on this was once per SIM card at the users risk.

Now, given the current climate, this is highly likely to change. This is not because of people completing the offer more than once, this is because of people doing it without paying!!!

Watch this space!!

[FurbtasticM]

Originally Posted by PotNoodle

It's not against anything

If you take a quick look back, I'd never said it was, I was asking the question not making a statment.

My only problem is the way you approached the whole thread with such a rubbish attitude. You said that once you got a reply you'd be outa here, I just hope you stick to your word

[PotNoodle]

Originally Posted by FurbtasticM

If you take a quick look back, I'd never said it was, I was asking the question not making a statment.

My only problem is the way you approached the whole thread with such a rubbish attitude. You said that once you got a reply you'd be outa here, I just hope you stick to your word

No offence, but people like you and others in this thread (except of course kudos), are the reason people HATE, yes HATE exceem. I see it everywhere, people don't like the way they get treated here, and my thread is a prime example. I mean 'Approched the thread', what the hell? Just answer the question, or don't, but don't start lectures that I and others have heard. Only ones with a rubbish attitude are a few people here. And kudos, thanks for clearing that up, only decent answer in this thread. I do always use credit, ENOUGH credit, so i'm not the kind of person he's talking about. Now would MODs PLEASE LOCK THIS THREAD, I had my answer ages ago, and requested it to be locked ages ago.

[arcticfox]

Originally Posted by PotNoodle

No offence, but people like you and others in this thread (except of course kudos), are the reason people HATE, yes HATE exceem. I see it everywhere, people don't like the way they get treated here, and my thread is a prime example. Only ones with a rubbish attitude are a few people here. And kudos, thanks for clearing that up, only decent answer in this thread.

I think i can say on behalf of most people here that if you don't like exceem, **** off and leave.

You are acting like someone with a grudge againt exceem, maybe a banned member. Say what you like about exceem but when you needed an answer, you chose to post on it, which tells me something.

Your thread is indeed a prime example, an example of someone who seems to be trying to scam an offer and also a network.

You got your answer, now leave exceem (like you said you were going to do) and keep your word by not posting again.

[Jon]

user has been banned - felt he could use a "disposable email" address, he/shes more than welcome to continue if they use a real one.