eXceem

Go Back   eXceem > Off Topic > Debating Forum

Claim your amazing £1,000 slots booster bonus now!


Do you have to be vegetarian to agree with the ban on fox hunting?

This is a discussion on Do you have to be vegetarian to agree with the ban on fox hunting? within the Debating Forum forums, part of the Off Topic category; Originally Posted by Stilwell On a warm night i like to leave my windows open at night should i stop ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18-06-10, 04:14 PM   #61
iPod 60gb
 
rollingsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: luton england
Posts: 1,746
rollingsta is just really nicerollingsta is just really nice
Send a message via MSN to rollingsta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stilwell View Post
On a warm night i like to leave my windows open at night should i stop doing this then as a fox could easily enter though them?
Leaving downstairs windows open at night is a bad thing to do

However the incidents that happened are very sad but its no different to anything that could happen. **** happens in life and we have to deal with it. Destroying mother nature is not the answer.

Dont know why it quoted like that

Last edited by arcticfox; 18-06-10 at 04:17 PM.. Reason: fixed quote
 
Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-10, 04:31 PM   #62
Mini Mac
 
TheDoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London
Posts: 3,788
TheDoctor is just really niceTheDoctor is just really nice
I agree 100% with Rollingsta.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-10, 04:39 PM   #63
Mini Mac
 
az87aris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 4,784
az87aris is a splendid one to beholdaz87aris is a splendid one to beholdaz87aris is a splendid one to beholdaz87aris is a splendid one to beholdaz87aris is a splendid one to behold
I didn't know that had even happened. It's an awful thing to have happened but the parents are partly to blame for leaving the door open for the fox to get in. If it was warm or what ever, open your windows, don't open the door and then sit and watch tv without keeping an eye on what is going on around you.

As for leaving windows open at night, I'd advise you to only leave your small windows open if any else you could find yourself with more than just a fox in your bedroom!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-10, 04:54 PM   #64
iPod 60gb
 
rollingsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: luton england
Posts: 1,746
rollingsta is just really nicerollingsta is just really nice
Send a message via MSN to rollingsta
Quote:
Originally Posted by az87aris View Post
I didn't know that had even happened. It's an awful thing to have happened but the parents are partly to blame for leaving the door open for the fox to get in. If it was warm or what ever, open your windows, don't open the door and then sit and watch tv without keeping an eye on what is going on around you.

As for leaving windows open at night, I'd advise you to only leave your small windows open if any else you could find yourself with more than just a fox in your bedroom!
Perfect answer. yes animals can get nasty but simple things that humans can do can protect us.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-10, 05:37 AM   #65
iPod Shuffle
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Philiplis is an unknown quantity at this point
if any else you could find yourself with more than just a fox in your bedroom? it was terrible!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08-10, 02:14 PM   #66
iPod Shuffle
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 21
jd123 is an unknown quantity at this point
in reply to the actual title, you definitely don't HAVE to be vegetarian to agree with ban on fox hunting - there are many non vegetarians who agree with the ban mainly due to the fact that they're not killing for food, the majority of the time they're killing for fun
 
Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-11, 04:08 PM   #67
iPod Shuffle
 
Erason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Erason is an unknown quantity at this point
I eat meat. IMO, Killing animals for meat is fine, since we make use of their dead body. Killing foxes for fun isn't, since we do not make use of the dead corpse.

That's basically my opinion.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-11, 07:45 PM   #68
iPod 60gb
 
williamblah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 1,635
williamblah is just really nicewilliamblah is just really nice
Send a message via twitter to williamblah
But you make use of the process of creating a dead corpse. You are still, in a sense, making use of the corpse, because you couldn't have a fox hunt without a dead corpse.

Just because you don't eat the saucepan doesn't mean you don't need it to make your meal.

Also, in (very late) reply to jd123, the point I'm debating isn't a literal title, it is more "Do you have to be vegetarian to agree with the ban on fox hunting, without having flawed logic?" - i.e. without being hypocritical.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-11, 07:54 PM   #69
iPod 60gb
 
williamblah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 1,635
williamblah is just really nicewilliamblah is just really nice
Send a message via twitter to williamblah
I would say a good formula to happiness (in my opinion the purpose of life), is 'Duration' multiplied by 'Enjoyment'. Meat is not a necessity in the third world, its popularity is a combination of preference and tradition. Tradition is irrelevant to moral reasoning - racism, cannibalism, sexism, huge gaps between the rich and the poor, etc, are all very very traditional features that have been very common throughout history, yet they are all widely considered to be morally wrong. Prefence is merely that - you prefer to have a diet with meat because you like it, and enjoy it.

People say that it is ok because you are making use of the meat to live - but you have alternatives. It is the same as if I killed someone so I could use their ribcage to open my bottle of beer (no idea where that came from) - I have alternatives. The only reason people eat meat in a first world country is because they enjoy it.

The only reason people fox hunt is because they enjoy it.

In both scenarios you are making a direct trade-off between your happiness, and an animals potential suffering. It doesn't matter that the killing of the foxes in fox hunting potentially cause more suffering than animals culled for meat, because if you are making a moral judgement on causing an animal x amount of suffering, in return for y amount of your own pleasure, then you shouldn't morally make a judgement on others who wish to do the same but in a different format.

And it is not only that you wish to judge others, but you wish to ban them from making the moral judgement themselves, by making it illegal.

I hope this makes more sense than some of my previous ramblings!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-11, 08:29 PM   #70
..is a Muppet!
 
FurbtasticM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
Posts: 10,100
FurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond reputeFurbtasticM has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by williamblah View Post
I hope this makes more sense than some of my previous ramblings!
Not a great deal, no

Research suggests that our earliest ancestors were omnivorous. Hunting didn't always produce rich pickings, was dangerous and took time so they turned to whatever they could find to provide sustenance, including vegetation.

Morality wasn't an issue, that evolved much later. All that mattered was surviving.

Quote:
Originally Posted by williamblah View Post
The only reason people fox hunt is because they enjoy it.
Some would agree, others suggest it is to aid vermin control.

Overall though, whilst this has bought out all the typical arguments that come with a fox hunting discussion, very few have anything to do with the thread title.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-11, 02:50 AM   #71
iPod 60gb
 
williamblah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 1,635
williamblah is just really nicewilliamblah is just really nice
Send a message via twitter to williamblah
Quote:
Originally Posted by FurbtasticM View Post
Research suggests that our earliest ancestors were omnivorous. Hunting didn't always produce rich pickings, was dangerous and took time so they turned to whatever they could find to provide sustenance, including vegetation.

Morality wasn't an issue, that evolved much later. All that mattered was surviving.
But I am talking about First World Countries, i.e. countries where surviving until 'old age' is the norm, and is taken for granted.

Basically my argument is that people who have animals killed to eat meat (not as a necessity to live, but as a personal preference because they enjoy it) should not impose rules on other people killing animals for their enjoyment either.

The meat eater gains happiness at the cost of potential suffering to an animal.

The fox hunter gains happiness at the cost of potential suffering to an animal.

In my opinion, lobbyists contributing to a ban on fox hunting would be the equivelant of vegetarians contributing to a ban on meat.

As I have tried to state, this situation only applies where the choice of meat is one of enjoyment only.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off





All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.
All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Forum posts are owned by the poster.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO
no new posts