| |||||||
This is a discussion on Do you think this is right? within the Debating Forum forums, part of the Off Topic category; "A soldier who refused to return to Afghanistan because he opposes the war has been jailed after admitting going absent ...
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| iPod 20gb Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Surrey
Posts: 591
![]() | Do you think this is right?"A soldier who refused to return to Afghanistan because he opposes the war has been jailed after admitting going absent without leave (Awol). L/Cpl Joe Glenton, 27, from York, joined the Army in 2004 but absconded in 2007 after serving with the Royal Logistic Corps in Afghanistan. He handed himself in after two years and six days' absence. L/Cpl Glenton, who is based at Abingdon in Oxfordshire, was jailed for nine months at a Colchester military court. He was also reduced to the ranks. " Source - BBC News - Awol soldier L/Cpl Joe Glenton jailed for nine months He had been sent to prision because he didn't go back to war. Do you think that is right? Forcing a soldier to go back to war. Especially after he has already been once. |
|
| | #2 |
| Super Moderator | Why is he a soldier if he's opposed to war? I do think it's wrong though.
__________________ 2011 Winner of Best Site Award and Grammanazi Award. Runner up for Member of the Year 2011 Spoiler Free iPhone | Free iPhone | Free iPhone 4S | Sign Define App | Freebie Proof Photo Blog ![]() Total Received: £4,218.94 plus Current Stats: 117 green 21 pending Spoiler |
|
| | #3 |
| iPod 30gb Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Cheltenham England
Posts: 1,493
![]() | Thats wrong. If a soldier doesn't want to fight, he doesn't want to fight. He probably doesn't want to return because he saw some terrible things over there. I have a friend serving in the US Marines and he is on his 3rd tour.
__________________ |
|
| | #4 |
| Call me Vlad Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: South London
Posts: 9,503
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | if it was ww2 he would've been shot for desertion
__________________ |
|
| | #5 |
| iPod 20gb Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Surrey
Posts: 591
![]() | |
|
| | #6 |
| iBook Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,266
![]() ![]() ![]() | If he didn't want to go back, he could have applied for discharge. By going AWOL he was breaking Army law which is an offence and treated by court martial. The penalties for going AWOL are known about, so he should have applied to leave the Army rather than go AWOL. In this respect, I don't think it is wrong that he was jailed. If he didn't want to fight in a war, then he shouldn't have joined the Army.
__________________ Received about £1600 worth so far! Spoiler |
|
| | #7 |
| iPod 20gb Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Surrey
Posts: 591
![]() | Surely he knew he wouldn't be discharged. Otherwise he would of done this and not got in trouble. I don't know as I don't know about this kind of thing. |
|
| | #9 |
| iPod 30gb Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,485
![]() | |
|
| | #10 |
| iPod 20gb | I don't think its wrong. He joined the army for cripes sake. That is what armies do ! Thats like a fireman saying Ooh I cant go in there there's flames in there ! Or a nurse saying i won't be in today in case i see some blood. get a grip if you dont wanna fight dont join the bloody army. |
|
| | #11 |
| MJ lady with maracas | When the armed forces came to college to try to recruit us, one of the things ill never forget one guy saying was "when you join, you belong to us for 9 years" - if someone decides to sign up to the forces then they know what they are letting them selves in for. I know of people in the Army/TA who have been discharged due to stress etc so if there was a valid medical/physiological issue I am sure it would have been handled fairly. Harsh decision maybe, but it was the right one.
__________________ |
|
| | #12 |
| iPod 60gb | Without strict penalty for breaking rank, soldiers psychologically would not be able to follow the orders they are given blindly, which is what they are expected to do. I am a pacifist, and so I believe that fighting is wrong full stop, however, as long as armies do exist, rules like this will be necessary. |
|
| | #13 |
| iPod 30gb | Not strict enough in my opinion, Should have to stay in prison untill he has served his compulsary nine years. |
|
| | #14 | |
| iPod 60gb | Quote:
The reason for such strict punishments is to assist in the whole package of things used by the army to turn people into order-following machines, without which the army will simply fall apart. It is only necessary to be strict enough to do the above, if a human feels that they cannot take being in the army, why should they be put into prison? I wouldn't want my tax money being used to keep someone like that behind bars! | |
|
| | #15 |
| iPod 60gb | I think it's absolutely right that he goes to prison. The role of our Armed forces is to protect our country. If this man wasn't made an example of and had been let off it would encourage others to go AWOL. Our military can't be a soft touch! I would go further than Alphawoo and say that he should spend more time in prison than the rest of his mandetory service time. Some soldiers may think otherwise that it's best to stay in prison for a few years than potentially die in war. On a personaly level it's a shame that he is going to prison for opposing a war but for the good of this country we need to have armed forces which will protect us rather than flee in the face of danger. |
|
| | #16 |
| iBook Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Brizzle
Posts: 2,504
![]() ![]() | i think its wrong... why? cos the soldiers dont get paid knowwhere nr as much as they should for risking their lifes.. they do alot and still get treated like crap. |
|
| | #17 |
| iPod 20gb Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Surrey
Posts: 591
![]() | But soldiers were made to think they will be properly equiped in war. They are not at the moment. Equipment is not what it should be. |
|
| | #18 |
| Mini Mac | I'm sure many or even all soldiers wish to be home with their families too. But he signed up, and he knew what he was in for.. |
|
| | #19 |
| iPod 30gb | that is seriously messed up.. |
|
| | #20 |
| iPod 60gb | It's not messed up. We don't want all of our troops (who protect our country) to all run home because they don't want to go to war. As someone said before, it's like a fireman not going into a burning building because there's fire in there. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |